Onkologie. 2012:6(2):59-64

Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors

Daniela Fischerová1, Michal Zikán1, Ivana Pinkavová1, Jiří Sláma1, Pavel Freitag1, Pavel Dundr2, Andrea Burgetová3, David Cibula1
1 Onkogynekologické centrum, Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK v Praze
2 Ústav patologie VFN a 1. LF UK v Praze
3 Radiodiagnostická klinika VFN a 1. LF UK v Praze

The majority of patients who suffer from an early or advanced stage of ovarian cancer complain about symptoms, mainly gastrointestinal

ones. The pelvic examination in ovarian cancer detection is limited by the adnexal position in the pelvis and frequent extraovarian

spread of disease. The evaluation of tumor marker CA 125 is justified only in suspicion of ovarian cancer, and rather is to be used in

the follow up of ovarian cancer patients during oncological treatment. Otherwise the known high false positivity of CA 125 may cause

unnecessary further examinations and invasive intervations. The evaluation of new tumor marker HE4 might be worthy in a selected

group of patients (e.g. with endometriomas etc.), however the HE4 or combination of HE4/CA 125 did not increase the detection of malignant

disease compared with CA 125 alone. Recently, ultrasound is the method of choice in diferential diagnosis between benign and

malignant ovarian tumors. The experienced examiner is also able to detect extraovarian tumor spread and to assess tumor operability.

MRI is used only to complement ultrasound in cases when high tissue resolution is needed. CT is a useful method for detection of extraovarian

spread, especially in cases when an ultrasound examiner experienced in abdominal scanning is not available. Similarly, PET/CT

is a highly accurate method for the detection of abdominal and extraabdominal tumor spread, but its use is limited by cost and the low

availability of this method. On the other hand, PET/CT is not recommended for primary cancer detection because of its lower sensitivity

in comparison to ultrasound and its high false positive rates.

Keywords: ovarian cancer, ultrasound, MRI, CT, PET, pelvic examination, symptom, CA 125, HE4

Published: April 23, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fischerová D, Zikán M, Pinkavová I, Sláma J, Freitag P, Dundr P, et al.. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Onkologie. 2012;6(2):59-64.
Download citation

References

  1. Heintz AP, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 95(Suppl. 1): 161-192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Dundr P. Prekancerózy endometria, děložní tuby a ovaria: přehled současné problematiky. Cesk Patol 2012; 48(1): 30-34. Go to PubMed...
  3. Dundr P. Karcinomy ovaria: současné diagnostické principy. Čes-slov Patol 2010; 46(3): 53-61.
  4. Skirnisdottir I, et al. Borderline ovarian tumors in Sweden 1960-2005: trends in incidence and age at diagnosis compared to ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 2008; 123(8): 1897-1901. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian C, et al. Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet 2008; 371(9609): 303-314. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Sherman ME, et al. Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis. Cancer 2004; 100(5): 1045-1052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Bristow RE, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(5): 1248-1259. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Goff BA, et al. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics. JAMA 2004; 291(22): 2705-2712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Goff BA, et al. Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer 2007; 109(2): 221-227. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Andersen MR, et al. Combining a symptoms index with CA 125 to improve detection of ovarian cancer. Cancer 2008; 113(3): 484-489. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Givens V, et al. Diagnosis and management of adnexal masses. Am Fam Physician 2009; 80(8): 815-820. Go to PubMed...
  12. Padilla LA, Radosevich DM, and Milad MP. Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88(1): 84-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Zanetta G, et al. Ultrasound, physical examination, and CA 125 measurement for the detection of recurrence after conservative surgery for early borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 81(1): 63-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Guerriero S, Alcazar JL. The role of ovarian cancer symptom index, physical examination and power Doppler mapping for predicting ovarian cancer in suspicious adnexal masses on B-mode ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34(Suppl. 1).
  15. Fischerova D. Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38(3): 246-266. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Calda P, Břešták M, Fischerová D. Ultrazvukové vyšetření v porodnictví a gynekologii: třístupňová koncepce a certifikace. Actual Gyn 2012; 4: 22-30.
  17. Alcazar JL, Jurado M. Three-dimensional ultrasound for assessing women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120(3): 340-346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Testa AC, et al. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34(6): 699-710. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Valentin L, et al. Comparison of, pattern recognition' and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18(4): 357-365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Valentin L. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14(4): 273-283. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Timmerman D, et al. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13(1): 11-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Van Holsbeke C, et al. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34(4): 454-461. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Geomini P, et al. The accuracy of risk scores in predicting ovarian malignancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113(2 Pt 1): 384-394. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Jacobs I, et al. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97(10): 922-929. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Timmerman D, et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 2010; 341: c6839. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Timmerman D, et al. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36(2): 226-234. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Van Gorp T, et al. Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses. Eur J Cancer 2012. Go to original source...
  28. Vergote I, et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001; 357(9251): 176-182. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. du Bois A, et al. Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112(2): 422-436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Testa AC, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of intra-abdominal sites of disease to predict likelihood of suboptimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39(1): 99-105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Fischerova D, et al. Ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy in the management of advanced abdomino-pelvic tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18(4): 833-837. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Zikan M, et al. Ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy of abdominal and pelvic tumors in gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36(6): 767-772. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Bazot M, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32(5): 712-723. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Togashi K. Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI. Eur Radiol 2003; 13(Suppl. 4): 87-104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Iyer VR, Lee SI. MRI, CT, and PET/CT for ovarian cancer detection and adnexal lesion characterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194(2): 311-321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Tempany CM, et al. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities - report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 2000; 215(3): 761-767. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Forstner R, et al. Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197(3): 619-626. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Axtell AE, et al. Multi-institutional reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(4): 384-389. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Risum S, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT for primary ovarian cancer - a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105(1): 145-149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Jung DC, et al. Discordant MRI/FDG-PET imaging for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18(4): 637-641. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Gu P, et al. CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71(1): 164-174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Schummer M, et al. Comparative hybridization of an array of 21,500 ovarian cDNAs for the discovery of genes overexpressed in ovarian carcinomas. Gene 1999; 238(2): 375-385. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Moore RG, et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112(1): 40-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Van Gorp T, et al. HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm. Br J Cancer 2011; 104(5): 863-870. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Jacob F, et al. No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 121(3): 487-491. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Grab D, et al. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77(3): 454-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Rieber A, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(1): 123-129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Yoshida Y, et al. Positron emission tomography in ovarian cancer: 18F-deoxy-glucose and 16alpha-18F-fluoro-17betaestradiol PET. J Ovarian Res 2009; 2(1): 7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Maggino T, et al. Prospective multicenter study on CA 125 in postmenopausal pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 54(2): 117-123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Fischerová D, et al. Diagnostika, in Onkogynekologie, D. Cibula and L. Petruželka, Editors. 2009, Grada Publishing, a.s.: Praha. 105.




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.