Onkologie. 2012:6(6):320-322

Possibilities of lymph nodes imaging

Radka Šlaisová1, Karel Benda1, Petr Szturz2, Hana Petrášová1, Marek Mechl1
1 Radiologická klinika FN Brno a LF MU Brno
2 Interní hematologická a onkologická klinika FN Brno a LF MU Brno

Many pathological processes can affect lymph nodes including specific and nonspecific inflammation, further a number of benign

reactive changes and primary and secondary tumour processes. Imaging and evaluation of lymph nodes as benign or potentially malignant

is particularly important mainly in case of cancer staging and for patients with incidental lymphadenopathy. The work presents an

overview of imaging methods used for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy. We mention modern imaging method of contrast-enhanced

ultrasound that requires a microbubble contrast agent for evaluation of nodal perfusion. The method is supplied with pictorial documentation

of ultrasound findings. Other methods are also listed – computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, including their

limitations and currently rarely used conventional lymphography.

Keywords: lymph nodes, ultrasonography, lymphography, computed tomography, contrast media

Published: December 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šlaisová R, Benda K, Szturz P, Petrášová H, Mechl M. Possibilities of lymph nodes imaging. Onkologie. 2012;6(6):320-322.
Download citation

References

  1. Adam Z, Vorlíček J, Hejlová A, et al. Diagnostický postup u pacientů s lymfadenopatií nejasné etiologie. Interní medicína pro praxi 2001; 10: 460-465.
  2. Guermazi A, Brice P, Hennequin Ch, Sarfati E. Lymphography: An Old Technique Retains Its Usefulness. RadioGraphics 2003; 23(6): 1541-1560. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Winterer JT, Blum U, Boos S, Konstantinides S, Langer M. Cerebral and Renal Embolization after Lymphography in a Patient with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Case Report. Radiology 1999; 210: 381-383. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Castellino RA, Billingham M, Dorfman RF. Lymphographic accuracy in Hodgkin's disease and malignant lymphoma with a note on the "reactive" lymph node as a cause of most false-positive lymphograms 1974. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 412-422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Glees JP, Gazet JC, MacDonald JS, Peckham MJ. The accuracy of lymphography in Hodgkin's disease. Clin Radiol 1974; 25: 5-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kademian MT, Wirtanen GW. Accuracy of Bipedal Lymphography in Hodgkin's Disease. Am J Roentgenol 1977; 129: 1041-1042. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. North LB, Lindell MM, Jing B-S, Wallace S. Current Use of Lymphography for Staging Lymphomas and Genital Tumors. AJR 1992; 158: 725-728. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Benda K. Lymfedém - patofyziologie a diagnostika. Praktická flebologie 2000; 9: 3-5.
  9. Ying M, Ahuja A. Sonography of Neck Lymph Nodes. Part I: Normal Lymph Nodes. Clinical Radiology 2003; 58: 351-358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ariji Y, Kimura Y, Hayashi N, et al. Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 303-307.
  11. Wu CH, Chang YL, Hsu WC, Ko JY, Sheen TS, Hsieh FJ. Usefulness of Doppler spectral analysis and power Doppler sonography in the differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 503-509. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Vassallo P, Wernecke K, Roos N, Peters PE. Differentiation of benign from malignant superficial lymphadenopathy: the role of high-resolution US. Radiology 1992; 183: 215-220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Quaia E. Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1995-2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Torzilli G. Adverse effects associated with SonoVue use. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2005; 4(3): 399-401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Moritz JD, Ludwig A, Oestmann JW. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumours. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175(5): 1279-1284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Rubaltelli L, Khadivi Y, Tregnaghi A, et al. Evaluation of lymph node perfusion using continuous mode harmonic ultrasonography with a second-generation contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 829-836. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Yu M, Liu Q, Song HP, et al. Clinical application of contrast-enhanced ultrasono-graphy in diagnosis of superficial lymphadenopathy. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 735-740. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Jakubcová R, Moulis M, Šálek D, Foukal J. Kontrastní ultrazvukové vyšetření periferních lymfatických uzlin - radiologicko-patologická korelace. Ces Radiol 2010; 64(1): 577-583. Go to original source...
  19. Van den Brekel MWM, Stel HV, Castelijns JA, et al. Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 1990; 177: 379-384. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Bělohlávek O, Fencl P. Hybridní zobrazování výpočetní a pozitronovou emisní tomografií. Medicína pro praxi 2004; 2: 87-89.
  21. Weissleder R, Elizondo G, Wittenberg J, Rabito CA, Bengele HH, Josephson L. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: characterization of a new class of contrast agents for MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 175: 489-493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Sigal R, Vogl T, Casselman J et al. Lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (Sinerem MR) --results of a phase-III multicenter clinical trial. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1104-1113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Anzai Y, Blackwell KE, Hirschowitz SL, et al. Initial clinical experience with dextran-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck cancer. Radiology 1994; 192: 709-715. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Mechl M, Benda K, Prášek J, Doubek J. Možnosti kontrastní MR lymfografie. Čes. Radiol., 1999; 53(4): 224-229. Go to original source...
  25. Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1627-1634.
  26. Abdel Razek AAK, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1468-1477. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.