Onkologie. 2015:9(1):22-26

Current indications for systemic neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients

Adam Paulík
Klinika onkologie a radioterapie Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové

Neoadjuvant therapy has been until recently indicated solely for enabling or facilitating surgical resection in primarily non-metastatic

locally advanced breast cancer. Recently, it has spread its field of application even in primarily well-operable tumors with dismal biological

features as an early therapy of potential micrometastatic systemic disease. In contemporary research, great attention is paid to the

complete extinction of invasive tumor in breast and regional lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy (i.e. pathologic complete response

– pCR). Predictors of pCR, the effect of pCR on long-term outcome and its possible role as valid surrogate endpoint for the treatment

efficacy in adjuvant setting are being currently investigated. Given the considerable financial and long-term issues of adjuvant trials, the

accelerated approval of new drugs that proved effective in generating pCR in neoadjuvancy can be used for the adjuvant treatment.

So that we could develop new therapeutic agents and get them to patiens quicker with less cost.

Keywords: neoadjuvant, adjuvant, pathologic complete remission, accelerated approval process, surrogate endpoint

Published: March 10, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Paulík A. Current indications for systemic neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. Onkologie. 2015;9(1):22-26.
Download citation

References

  1. Caudle AS, Gonzales-Angulo AM, Hunt KK, et al. Predictors of tumor progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 11: 1821-1828. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J, Llombart-Cussac A, Eremin J, Vinholes J, et al. Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 15271-532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Semiglazov V, Kletsel A, Semiglazov V. Exemestane (E) vs tamoxifen (T) as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopauzal women with ER+ breast cancer (T2N1-2, T3N0-1, T4N0M0). J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 16S (Abstract 530). Go to original source...
  4. Ellis ME, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Lin L, Snider J, Prat A, et al. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype-ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2342-2349. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. N.M.Tun GM. Villani and K.Ong. Risk of having BRCA mutations in women with triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol, 2011 Breast Cancer Symposium. Vol 29, No 27_suppl (September 20 Supplement), 2011: 160. Go to original source...
  6. Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ. Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 18 (2): CD005002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer J-U, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(15): 1796-1804. Epub 2012 Apr 16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. O'Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg LS, Danso MA, et al. A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: (suppl; abstr 1007). Go to original source...
  9. Rugo HS, Olopade O, DeMichele A, et al. Veliparib/carboplatin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer: First efficacy results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Presented at: the 36th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium held December 10-14, 2013, San Antonio, TX. Abstract S5-02.. Go to original source...
  10. KriegeM, JagerA, Hooning MJ, et al. The efficacy of taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer. 2012; 118: 899-907. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Silver DP, Richardson AL, Eklund AC, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1145-1153. 20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. RyanPD, TungNM, Isakoff SJ, et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatin and bevacizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Safety and efficacy. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 15s (suppl; abstr551). Go to original source...
  13. Von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Salat C, et al. A randomized phase II trial investigating the addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto). J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:15. (suppl; abstr1004). Go to original source...
  14. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, Singh B, Cirrincione CT, et al. Impact of the addition of carboplatin (Cb) and/or bevacizumab (B) to neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel (P) followed by dose-dense AC on pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): CALGB40603 (Alliance). Presented at: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium San Antonio, TX; 2013; abstract S5-01. Go to original source...
  15. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S et al. Follow-up results of NOAH, a randomized phase III trial evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab (CT+H) followed by adjuvant H versus CT alone, in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced breast cancer. Presented at: 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting. Oral abstract session. Abstract number: 503. J Clin Oncol 2013. (suppl; abstr.503). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Untch M, Rezai M, Loibl S, Fasching PA, Huober J, Tesch H, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(12): 2024-2031. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 25-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol, 2013; 24(9): 2278-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Buzdar A, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance): Definitive analysis of randomized neoadjuvant trial comparing FEC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (FEC -> P+T) with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC plus trastuzumab (P+T -> FEC+T) in HER2+ operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2013 (suppl; abstr 502). Go to original source...
  20. De Azambuja E, Holmes AP, Piccart-Gebhart M, Holme E, Di Vosino S, Swaby RF, et al. Lapatinib With Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer (NeoALTTO): Survival Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial and Their Association With Pathological Complete Response. Lancet Oncol, 2014;15:1137-1146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Piccart-Gebhart M, Holme AP, Baselga J, De Azambuja E, Dueck AC, Viale G, et al. First results from the phase III ALTTO trial (BIG 2-06; NCCTG [Alliance] N063D) comparing one year of anti-HER2 therapy with lapatinib alone (L), trastuzumab alone (T), their sequence (T -> L), or their combination (T+L) in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol, 2014; 32:5s (suppl; abstr LBA4). Go to original source...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.