Onkologie. 2015:9(6):264-267

Advanced pancreatic cancer

Miroslav Ryska1,4, Hana Parobková2, Pavel Záruba1, Luboš Petruželka3
1 Chirurgická klinika 2. LF UK a ÚVN, Praha
2 Radiodiagnostické oddělení ÚVN &ndash, VFN, Praha
3 Onkologická klinika 1. LF UK a ÚVN, Praha
4 Fakulta zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce, Trnavská Univerzita, Trnava

Pancreatic cancer is a solid, malignant, unpreventable, chemoradioresistant tumour with an unfavourable prognosis. Radical resection

is the only potentially curable treatment modality that, coupled with adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly prolongs the survival in

20% of patients. In a proportion of primary unresectable patients (borderline), an active approach is currently preferred that utilizes

neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in order to reach subsequent resection. In approximately 70% of patients, palliative or symptomatic

treatment is indicated. When pancreatic cancer is suspected, it is necessary to refer the patient as soon as possible to a specialized centre.

The prevailing feeling of despair in a part of the professional public has to be replaced by a rational approach.

Keywords: pancreatic cancer, staging, borderline, radical resection

Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ryska M, Parobková H, Záruba P, Petruželka L. Advanced pancreatic cancer. Onkologie. 2015;9(6):264-267.
Download citation

References

  1. Alexakis N, Halloran C, Raraty M, et al. Current standard of surgery for pancreatic cancer. BJS, 2004; 91: 1410-1427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Carrato A, Falcone A, Ducreux M, et al. A systematic review of the burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe: real-world impact on survival, quality of life and costs. J Gastrointest Canc 2015; 46: 201-211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2010; 467: 1114-1117. Go to original source...
  4. Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Ann Oncol, 10, 1999; Suppl 4: S1-S3.
  5. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2013. Cancer J Clin 3013; 63: 11-30. Go to original source...
  6. Riall TS. What is the effect of age on pancreatic resection? Adv Surg 2009; 43: 233-249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Ryska M, Dušek L, Pohnán R, et al. Kvalita života je důležitým faktorem indikační rozvahy u nemocných s karcinomem pankreatu. Multicentrická prospektivní studie. Rozhl Chir; 2012; 91: 207-216.
  8. Ardengh JC, Malheiros CA, Pereira V, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration using Helical Computerized Tomography for TN Staging and Vascular Injury in Operable Pancreatic Carcinoma. JOP 2009; 10: 310-317. Go to PubMed...
  9. Petr WT, Pistes MD, Wayne A, et al. Effect of praeoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg, 234, 2001: 47-55. Go to original source...
  10. Tempero, MA, Arnoletti JP, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, vision 2. 2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012; 10: 703-713. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012; 19: 230-241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Katz MH, Marsh R, Herman JM, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: need for standardization and methods for optimal clinical trial design. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 2787-2795. Go to original source...
  13. Lopez NE, Prendergast C, Lowy AM. Boderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and management. WJG 2014; 20: 10740-10751. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Katz MHG, Fleming JB, Bhosale P, et al. Response of boderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not refected by radiographic indicators. Cancer 2012; 118: 5749-5756. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Chuong MD, Springett GM, Freilich JM, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is effective and well tolerated. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86: 516-522. Go to original source...
  16. Barugola G, Partelli S, Crippa S, et al. Outcomes after resection of locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Am J Surg 2012; 203: 132-139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Chauffert B, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-2001 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1592-1599. Go to original source...
  18. Ohuchida K, et al. Radiation to stromal fibroblasts increases invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells through tumor-stromal interactions. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 3215-3222. Go to original source...
  19. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. NEJM 2004; 350: 1200-1210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patiens with resected pancreatic cancer - the CONCO-001 randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1473-1481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Heinemann V, Lebianca R, Hinke A, et al. Increased survival using platinum analog combined with gemcitabine as compared to single-agent gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: pooled analysis of two randomized trials, the GERCOR/GISCAD intergroup study and a German multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 1652-1659. Go to original source...
  22. Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, et al. Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3778-3785. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. Randomized phase III trial comparing FOLFORINOX versus gemcitabine as a first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Preplanned iterim analysis results of the PRODIGE 4 ACCORD 11 trial (abstract). J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(7s): abstract 4010. Go to original source...
  24. Regine FW, Winter KA, Abrams RA, et al. Fluorouracil vs Gemcitabine Chemotherapy Before and After Fluorouracil-Based Chemoradiation Following Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. JAMA 2008; 299: 1019-1026. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010; 304: 1073-1081. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Fine RL, Fogelman DR, Schreibman SM, et al. The gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008; 61: 167-175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan R, Borad M, et al. SPARC correlation with response to gemcitabine (G) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) in patients with advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer: A phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol 2009 ASCO; 27(15S): abstr 4525. Go to original source...
  28. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 1960-1966. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Philip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, et al. Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3605-3610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3617-3622. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramell aC, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology 2015; 26(Supplement 5): v56-v68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer N Eng J Med 2011; 364: 1817-1825. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 369: 2013: 1691-1703. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Myers RS, Hammond WG, Ketcham AS. Cryosurgery of primate pancreas. Cancer 1970; 25: 411-414. Go to original source...
  35. Dromi SA, Walsh MP, Herby S, et al. RFA induces antigen-presenting cell infiltration and amplification of weak tumor-induced imunity. Radiology 2009; 251: 58-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Pandya GJ, Shelat VG. Radiofrequency ablativ of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The past, the present and the future. WJGO 2015; 7: 6-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.