Onkologie. 2016:10(4):166-169 | DOI: 10.36290/xon.2016.036

Lobular breast cancer

Katarína Petráková
Klinika komplexní onkologické péče, MOÚ Brno

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer. The majority of tumours are grade 2, have

positive oestrogen receptors (ER), low proliferation and no HER2 receptor amplification. During the first five years, ILC has a better

prognosis than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In the 6–10 year follow-up interval, the overall survival rates are more favourable

for patients with IDC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher sensitivity for ILC than mammography (MG); however, its

benefit is not unequivocal. In neoadjuvant studies, ILC is reported to have lower pCR rates, which has no effect on the overall

survival of patients. A high treatment response rate is achieved with neoadjuvant hormone therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is

recommended in patients with more than four positive nodes, negative oestrogen receptors, and grade 3.

Keywords: invasive lobular carcinoma, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, hormone therapy

Published: August 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petráková K. Lobular breast cancer. Onkologie. 2016;10(4):166-169. doi: 10.36290/xon.2016.036.
Download citation

References

  1. Arpino G, Bardou V, Clark G, Elledge R. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6: R149-156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Li Ci, Anderson BQ, Daling JR, et al. Trend in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. JAMA. 2003; 289: 1421-1424. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Li Ci, Wiess NS, Stanford JL, et al. Hormone replacement therapy in relation to risk of lobular and ductal breast carcinoma in middle-aged women. Cancer 2000; 882: 570-577.
  4. Berx G, Van RF. The E-cadherin/catenin complex an important gatekeeper in breast cancer tumorigenesis and malignant progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2001; 3: 289-293. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Pharoah PD, Guilford P, Caldas C, et al. Incidence of gastric cancer and breast cancer in CDH1 (E-cadherin) mutation carriers from hereditary diffuse gastric cancer families. Gastroenterology. 2000; 121: 1348-1353. Go to original source...
  6. Fitzgerald RC, Hardwick R, Huntsman D, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer:update consensus guidelines for clinical managment and directions for future research. J Med Genett. 2010; 47: 436-444. Go to original source...
  7. Yoder BJ, Wilkinson EJ, Massoll NA. Molecular and morphologic distinctions between infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast J 2007; 13: 172-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, et al. An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 392-401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Biglia N, Maggiorotto F, Liberale V, et al. Clinical-pathologic features, long term-outcome and surgical treatment in a large series of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39: 455-460. Go to original source...
  10. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1507-1515. Go to original source...
  11. van den Broek N, van den Sangen MJ, et al. Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 105: 63-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Wasif N, Maggard MA, Ko CY, Giuliano AE. Invasive lobular vs. ductal breast cancer: a stage-matched comparison of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 1862-9.30. Go to original source...
  13. Pestalozzi BC, Zahrieh D, Mallon E. Distinct clinical and prognostic features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: combined results of 15 International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3006-3014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Talman ML, Jensen MB, Rank F. Invasive lobular breast cancer. Prognostic significance of histological malignancy grading. Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 803-809. Go to original source...
  15. Narbe U, Bendahl PO, Grabau D, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast:long-term prognostic value of Ki67 and histological grade, alone and in combination with estrogen receptor. SpringerPlus 2014; 3: 70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Loibl S, Volz C, Mau C, et al. Response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 1,051 patients with infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 144: 153-162. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Hilton J, Arnaout A, Clemons M. Primary endocrine therapy as an approach for patients with localized breast cancer deemed no to be surgical candidates. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2014; 8: 53-58. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Yeo B, Dowsett M. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: Patient selection, treatment duration and surrogate endpoints. Breast. 2015; 24(Suppl. 2): S78-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al. Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):805-16. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013; 381(9869): 804. Go to original source...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.