Onkologie 2020: 14(Suppl.G): 171-174 | DOI: 10.36290/xon.2020.099

Long-term control of generalized lung cancer with pembrolizumab

Libor Havel
Pneumologická klinika 1. LF UK, Thomayerova nemocnice, Praha

So far, platinum doublet chemotherapy has been the only treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The only exception were patients with EGFR or ALK mutations in whom treatment with the respective tyrosine kinase inhibitors was the method of choice. With the advent of immunotherapy and a number of positive trials performed in higher lines of treatment, interest has shifted to the first line of treatment. The philosophy of this approach has been to offer patients a more effective as well as less toxic treatment, with a clearly prolonged survival. Two trials with pembrolizumab have been conducted comparing pembrolizumab monotherapy with platinum-based doublet treatment: Keynote-024 included strong PD-L1 expressors (over 50% of PD-L1 expression) while Keynote-042 enrolled patients with any PD-L1 expression. Both trials were positive and pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA for use in these indications. We present a case report of one of the first patients treated successfully with pembrolizumab in the first line of treatment.

Keywords: non-small-cell-ling cancer, immunotherapy, pembrolizumab, chemotherapy.

Published: January 8, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Havel L. Long-term control of generalized lung cancer with pembrolizumab. Onkologie. 2020;14(Suppl.G / Onkologické kazuistiky 6):171-174. doi: 10.36290/xon.2020.099.
Download citation

References

  1. Brahmer J, Reckamp K, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer May 31, 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Borghaei H, et al. Phase III, randomized trial (CheckMate 057) of nivolumab (NIVO) versus docetaxel (DOC) in advanced non-squamous cell (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr LBA109). Go to original source...
  3. Herbst R, Baas P, Dong-Wan K, Felip E, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2016; 387(10027): 1540-1550. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial The Lancet 2017; 389(10066): 255-265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1823-1833. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Reck M, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.J Clin Oncol 2019 Jan 8: JCO1800149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mok TS, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherpy for previously untreated, PD-L1 expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell-lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III trial. The Lancet 393(10183): 1819-1830.




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.