Onkologie. 2012:6(3):165-168

Colon capsule in the context of colorectal cancer screening

Štěpán Suchánek, Michal Voška, Gabriela Vepřeková, Barbora Rotnáglová, Jan Martínek, Miroslav Zavoral
Interní klinika, 1. lékařská fakulta, Univerzita Karlova v Praze a Ústřední vojenská nemocnice &ndash,

On a worldwide scale, the Czech Republic is among the countries with very high rates of and high mortality from colorectal cancer.

Secondary prevention, i. e. identifying precancerous lesions – adenomatous polyps that are subsequently removed, thereby inhibiting

tumor formation, plays an important role in fighting this type of tumor. Population statistical data suggest that the risk of disease with

this tumor type significantly increases with age, namely from the age of 50 years. Therefore, a screening program for sporadic colorectal

cancer has been under way in the Czech Republic since the year 2000. Persons over 50 years of age who have been asymptomatic so far

are offered fecal occult blood test (FOBT). If the test result is positive, a colonoscopic examination follows. A colonoscopic examination

is newly performed even without a previous FOBT in persons older than 55 years. Other screening programs include sigmoidoscopy, a

combination of fecal occult blood test and sigmoidoscopy, and virtual colonography. However, participation of the target population

in this program is still inadequate, particularly when compared to the screening for breast, prostate, and cervical cancers. Hence, it is

our effort to add to the current methods a test that would have similar effectiveness in detecting precancerous lesions, but would be

acceptable on a larger scale. Colon capsule endoscopy (capsule colonoscopy) can become such a procedure.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, screening, colon capsule endoscopy

Published: July 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Suchánek Š, Voška M, Vepřeková G, Rotnáglová B, Martínek J, Zavoral M. Colon capsule in the context of colorectal cancer screening. Onkologie. 2012;6(3):165-168.
Download citation

References

  1. Ladas SD, Triantafyllou K, Spada C, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE): recommendations (2009) on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 220-227. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, et al. Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 963-970. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Lieberman DA. Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1179-1187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 1026-1031. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-NavasM, et al. Second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 581-589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hassan C, Zullo A, Winn S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 414-421. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Schoofs N, Devičre J, Van Gossum A, et al. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 971-977. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Van Gossum A, Navas MM, Fernandez-Urien I, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 264-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Spada C, Hassan C, Ingrosso M, et al. A new regimen of bowel preparation for PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 300-304. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.