Onkologie. 2018:12(4):161-167 | DOI: 10.36290/xon.2018.030

Current treatment options for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

Miloš Pešek
Klinika pneumologie a ftizeologie FN Plzeň

In this concise article, the author presents the differences between squamous cell and non-squamous cell lung cancers in termsof clinical, phenotypic, and genetic parameters. Squamous cell cancers are generally associated with an older age of patients,more serious comorbidities, and less frequent metastases to the brain in comparison with non-squamous cell cancers. In terms ofgenetics, they have a different spectrum of driver mutations, with biologically targeted therapy having only limited possibilities inthese cancers (ramucirumab, erlotinib, afatinib). More recently, immune-oncological treatment using the monoclonal antibodiesnivolumab, pembrolizumab, and, possibly, atezolizumab as well, has resulted in an improvement in the dire prognosis of patientswith advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. The expression of PD-L1 is not a predictor of efficacy of these antibodies;what has shown promise in identifying optimal patients for this treatment is the assessment of tumour mutation load.

Keywords: squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immune-oncological treatment, nivolumab,
pembrolizumab, atezolizumab

Published: September 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pešek M. Current treatment options for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Onkologie. 2018;12(4):161-167. doi: 10.36290/xon.2018.030.
Download citation

References

  1. Cetin K, et al. Survival by histologic subtype in stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Clin Epidemiol 2011; 3: 139-148. Go to original source...
  2. Pesch B, et al. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer-relative risk estimates for the major histological types from a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer 2012; 131: 1210-1219. Go to original source...
  3. Radzikowska E, et al. Lung cancer in women: age, smoking, histology, performance status, stage, initial treatment and survival. Population-based study of 20 561 cases. Ann Oncol 2002; 13: 1087-1093. Go to original source...
  4. Houston KA, et al. Patterns in lung cancer incidence rates and trends by histologic type in the United States, 2004-2009. Lung Cancer 2014; 86: 22-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Nichols L, et al. Causes of death of patients with lung cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136: 1552-1557. Go to original source...
  6. Hirsch FR, et al. The prognostic and predictive role of histology in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a literature review. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3: 1468-1481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Rosado-de-Christenson ML, et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1994; 14: 429-446. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Mujoomdar A, et al. Clinical predictors of metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung carcinoma: primary tumor size, cell type, and lymph node metastases. Radiology 2007; 242: 882-888. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Janssen-Heijnen ML, et al. Prevalence of co-morbidity in lung cancer patients and its relationship with treatment: a population-based study. Lung Cancer 1998; 21: 105-113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Asmis TR, et al. Age and comorbidity as independent prognostic factors in the treatment of non small-cell lung cancer: a review of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trials. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 54-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Putila J, Guo NL. Combining COPD with clinical, pathological and demographic information refines prognosis and treatment response prediction of non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2014; 9: e100994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Gr?nberg BH, et al. Influence of comorbidity on survival, toxicity and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2225-2234. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Carter BD, et al. Smoking and mortality-beyond established causes. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 631-640. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Li T, et al. Genotyping and genomic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for current and future therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 1039-1049. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers Nature. 2012; 489: 519. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sandler A, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2542-2550. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Socinski MA, et al. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2055-2062. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Soria, et al. Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 897. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Brahmer J, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 123-135. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Borghaei, et al. Nivolumab (nivo) vs docetaxel (doc) in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC: CheckMate 017/057 2-y update and exploratory cytokine profile analyses. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 9025). Go to original source...
  21. Herbst, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10027): 1540. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Rittmeyer, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated NSCLC (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 389(10066): 255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Reck M, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1823-1833. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Garon EB, Ciuleanu TE, Arrieta O, et al. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2014 Aug 23; 384(9944): 665-73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu T-E, Pluzanski A, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden. N Engl J Med. This article was published on April 16, 2018, at NEJM.org.
  26. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. Durvalumab afgter Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.