Onkologie. 2011:5(3):146-151

Prognosis of high-risk group of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermineted significance (MGUS)

Mária Klincová1, Aneta Mikulášová3, Lucie Kovářová2, Viera Sandecká1, Jakub Radocha4, Vladimír Maisnar4, Zdeněk Adam1, Marta Krejčí1, Luděk Pour1, Lenka Zahradová1, Andrea Křivanová1, Petr Szturz1, Roman Hájek1,2
1 Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN a LF MU Brno
2 Oddělení klinické hematologie –, Laboratoř experimentální a buněčné imunoterapie FN Brno
3 Laboratoř molekulární cytogenetiky, Ústav experimentální biologie, Přírodovědecká fakulta,

and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)

Monoclonal gammopathy of undeterminated significance (MGUS) and asymptomatic form of myeloma are associated with a long-term

risk of progression to active disease symptomatic multiple myeloma or related malignancy. As far as the malignant transformation of

MGUS is concerned, size and type of the serum monoclonal immunoglobulin (monoclonal protein, M-protein, M-Ig), serum kappa and

lambda free light chain ratio, number of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow, number of clonal plasma cells in peripheral blood, immunophenotype

of plasma cells, and another factors seem to play a predictive role.

Keywords: monoclonal gammopathy of undeterminated significance, asymptomatic form of multiple myeloma, prognosis, progression

Published: July 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Klincová M, Mikulášová A, Kovářová L, Sandecká V, Radocha J, Maisnar V, et al.. Prognosis of high-risk group of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermineted significance (MGUS). Onkologie. 2011;5(3):146-151.
Download citation

References

  1. Kyle RA. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: natural history in 241 cases. American Journal of Medicine 1978; 64: 814-826. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Kyle RA, Rajkumar V. Monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined signifikance. Myeloma 2002: 415-432.
  3. Jones HB. Chemical pathology. Lancet 1847; 2: 88-92. Go to original source...
  4. Macintyre W. Cases of mollities and fragilitas ossium, accompanied with urine strongly charged with animal matter. Medical and Chirurgical Transactions of London 1850; 33: 211-232. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. A review. British Journal od Haematology 2006; 134: 573-589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, MM and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. British Journal of Haematology 2003; 121: 749-757. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Rajkumar SV. MGUS and smouldering multiple myeloma: update on pathogenesis, natural history, and managment. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2005; 340-345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Long-term followup of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undeterminated significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2004; 79: 859-866. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Blade J, Rosinol L, Cibeira MT, et al. Pathogenesis and progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undeterminated significance. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1651-1657. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. English Journal of Medicine 2007; 356: 2582-2590. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Mateos MV, López-Corral L, Hernández M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial of lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Len/dex) vs therapeutic abstention in smoldering multiple myeloma at high risk of progression to symptomatic MM: Results of the first interim analysis. Blood. 2009; 114(22): 254 [oral]. Go to original source...
  12. Barlogie B, Tricot G, Anaissie E, et al. Thalidomide and Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma. New English Journal of Medicine 2008; 354: 1021-1030. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Axelsson U. A 20-year follow-up study of 64 subjects with M- components. Acta Medica Scandinavica 1986; 219: 519-522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Cohen HJ, Crawfort J, Rao MK, et al. Radical differences in the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy in a community - based sample of the elderly. American Journal of Medicine 1998; 104: 439-444. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Bowden M, Crawford J, Cohen HJ, et al. A comparative study of monoclonal gammopathies and immunoglobulin levels in Japanese and United States elderly [published erratum in J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41 622]. Journal of American Geriatric Society 1993; 41: 11-14.
  16. Davis FE, Dring AM, Li Ch, et al. Insights into the multistep transformation of MGUS to myeloma usány microarray expresion analysis. Blood 2003; 102: 4504-4511. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Landgren O, Gridley G, Turesson I, et al. Risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and subsequent multiple myeloma among African American and white veterans in the United States. Blood. 2006; 107(3): 904-906. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Landgren O. Katzmann JA, Hsing AW, et al. Prevalence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance Among Men in Ghana. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82(12): 1468-1473. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Iwanaga M, Tagawa M, Tsukasaki K, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: study of 52,802 persons in Nagasaki City, Japan. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2007; 82(12): 1474-1479. Go to original source...
  20. Blade J. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. New English Journal of Medicine 2006; 355(26): 2765-2770. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Malik AA, Ganti AK, Potti A, et al. Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in the incidence and clinical course of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. American Jornal of Gastroenterology 2002; 97(6): 1371-1374. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Plevak MF, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. British Journal od Haematology 2002; 119: 706-708. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood 2009; 113: 5412-5417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Hideshima T, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM, et al. Advances in biology of multiple myeloma: Clinical applications. Blood 2004; 104: 607-618. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Perez-Persona E, Mateo G, García-Sanz R, et al. Risk of progression in smouldering myeloma and monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance: comparative analysis of the evolution of monoclonal component and multiparameter flow cytometry of bone marrow plasma cells. British Journal of Haematology 2010; 148(1): 110-114. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Cesana C, Klersy C, Barbarano L, et al. Prognostic factors for malignant transformation in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. Jouranl of Clinical Oncology 2002; 20(6): 1625-1634. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. New English Journal of Medicine 2004; 351: 1860-1873. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Rosi?ol L, Cibeira MT, Montoto S, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: predictors of malignant transformation and recognition of an evolving type characterized by a progressive increase in M protein size. Mayo Clin Proceedings 2007; 82(4): 428-434. Go to original source...
  29. Rosiňol L, Blade J, Esteve J, et al. Smouldering multiple myeloma: natural history and recognition of an evolving type. British Journal of Haematology 2003; 123: 631-636. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Bladé J, Rosi?ol L, and Cibeira MT. Are all myelomas preceded by MGUS? Blood 2009; 113: 5370. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Bladé J, Kyle RA. IgD monoclonal gammopathy with long-term follow-up. British Journal of Haematology 1994; 88(2): 395-396. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Bradwell AR, Harding SJ, Fourrier NJ, et al. Assessment of Monoclonal Gammopathies by Nephelometric Measurement of Individual Immunoglobulin K/L. Clinical Chemistry 2009; 55: 1646-1655. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Katzmann JA, Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, et al. Elimination of the need for urine studies in the screening algorithm for monoclonal gammopathies by using serum immunofixation and free light chain assays. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2006; 81: 1575. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Blood 2005; 106: 812-817. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 2010; 24: 1121-1127. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Katzman JA, Clark RJ, Abraham RS, et al. Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free and free immunoglobulin light chains: relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains. Clinical Chemistry 2002; 48: 1437-1444. Go to original source...
  37. Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood 2008; 111: 785-789. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Perez-Persona E, Vidriales MB, Mateo G, et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2007; 110: 2586-2592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Billadeau D, Van Ness B, Kimlinger T, et al. Clonal circulating cells are common in plasma cell proliferative disorders: a comparison of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, and active myeloma. Blood 1996; 88(1): 289-296. Go to original source...
  40. Witzig TE, Gertz MA, Lust JA, et al. Peripheral blood monoclonal plasma cells as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 1996; 88(5): 1780-1787. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Kumar S, Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, et.al. Prognostic value of circulating plasma cells in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005; 23(24): 5668-5674. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Sarasquete ME, García-Sanz R, González D, et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quanttative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. Haematologica 2005; 90(10).
  43. Paiva B, Vidriales MB, Pérez JJ, et al. Multiparameter flow cytometry quantification of bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis provides more prognostic information than morphological assessment in myeloma patients. Haematologica 2009; 94(11): 1599-1602. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Nadav L, Katz BZ, Baron S, et.al. Diverse niches within multiple myeloma bone marrow aspirates affect plasma cell enumeration. British Journal of Haematology 2006; 133, 530-532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Sezer O, Heider U, Zavrski I, et al. Differentiation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and MM using flow cytometric characteristics of plasma cells. Haematologica 2001; 86: 837-843. Go to PubMed...
  46. Kovarova L, Buresova, I, Buchler T, et al. Phenotype of plasma cells in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Neoplasma 2009; 56: 526-532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Cremer FW, Bila J, Buck I, et al. Delineation of distinct subgroups of multiple myeloma and a model for clonal evolution based on interphase cytogenetics. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005; 44(2): 194-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R, et al. Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Research 2004; 64(4): 1546-1558. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Bergsagel PL, Chesi M, Nardini E, et al. Promiscuous translocations into immunoglobulin heavy chain switch regions in multiple myeloma. Proceeding of National Academia of Science U. S. A. 1996; 93(24): 13931-13936. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Hoyer JD, Hanson CA, Fonseca R, et al. The (11;14)(q13;q32) translocation in multiple myeloma. A morphologic and immunohistochemical study. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2000; 113(6): 831-837. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Ross FM, Ibrahim AH, Vilain-Holmes A, et al. European myeloma network recomendations for FISH in myeloma. Haematologica 2007; 92(6) suppl. 2: 100-101.
  52. Fonseca R, Bailey RJ, Ahmann GJ, et al., Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2002; 100(4): 1417-1424. Go to original source...
  53. Hayman SR, Bailey RJ, Jalal SM, et al. Translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus are possible early genetic events in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis. Blood 2001; 98(7): 2266-2268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Chesi M, Nardini E, Lim RS, et al. The t(4;14) translocation in myeloma dysregulates both FGFR3 and a novel gene, MMSET, resulting in IGH/MMSET hybrid transcripts. Blood 1998 92(9): 3025-3034. Go to original source...
  55. Malgeri U, Baldini L, Perfetti V, et al. Detection of t(4;14) (p16.3;q32) chromosomal translocation in multiple myeloma by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis of IGH-MMSET fusion transcripts. Cancer Research 2000; 60(15): 4058-4061. Go to PubMed...
  56. Chesi M, Bergsagel PL, Shonukan OO, et al. Frequent dysregulation of the c-maf proto-oncogene at 16q23 by translocation to an Ig locus in multiple myeloma. Blood 1998; 91(12): 4457-4463. Go to original source...
  57. Zojer N, Königsberg R, Ackermann J, et al. Deletion of 13q14 remains an independent adverse prognostic variable in multiple myeloma despite its frequent detection by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Blood 2000; 95(6): 1925-1930. Go to original source...
  58. Sawyer JR, Tricot G, Lukacs JL, et al. Genomic instability in multiple myeloma: evidence for jumping segmental duplications of chromosome arm 1q. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2005; 42(1): 95-106. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Kuglík P, Vranová V, Filková H. Metody klasické a molekulární cytogenetiky v diagnostice mnohočetného myelomu. Klinická Onkológie 2008; 21: 198-202.
  60. Smetana J, Kuglík P, Grešliková H, Kupská R, Filková H, Oltová A, Hájek R. Stanovení hyperdiploidie u pacientu s mnohočetným myelomem pomocí imunofluorescenčního značení plazmatických buněk a techniky tříbarevné interfázní FISH. Klinická Onkológie 2008; 21: 210-211.




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.