Onkologie. 2015:9(1):29-33

Supine versus prone position for adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with pendulous breasts

Andrea Masaryková, David Lederleitner
Oddelenie radiačnej onkológie NOÚ, Bratislava

Adjuvant radiotherapy contributes to better outcomes in patients with breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Whole breast irradiation

is associated with damage to the heart and lungs, increased cardiovascular mortality, and the development of lung cancer, that

is, with the risks that may occur 15–20 years after treatment. Breast irradiation in the prone position, is one of the way to reduce radiation

toxicity in patients conditioned with large breasts undergoing adjuvant therapy. In case reports point out the differences in the

volume of the heart and lungs at both locations, we compare the dosimetric parameters in breast irradiation in both positions and point

out the differences in their planning. These techniques can not be combined with irradiation of the lymph nodes, but they can be used

in the treatment of bilateral tumors.

Keywords: breast cancer, lung volume, supine, prone position

Published: March 10, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Masaryková A, Lederleitner D. Supine versus prone position for adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with pendulous breasts. Onkologie. 2015;9(1):29-33.
Download citation

References

  1. Gaya AM, Ashford RF. Cardiac complications of radiation therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2005 May; 17 (3): 153-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Hooning MJ, Botma A, Aleman BM et al. Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 10-year survivors of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(5): 365-375. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Huppert N, Jozsef G, De Wyngaert K, Formenti SC. The Role of Prone Setup in Breast Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2011; 1: 31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Leonard KL Solomon D, Hepel JT, et al. Axillary lymph node dose with tangential whole breast radiation in the prone versus supine position: a dosimetric study, Radiation Oncol 2012, 7:72, http://www.ro-journal.com/content/7/1/72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Stegman LD, et al. Prone WBI: Cosmetic Outcome., Int J of Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007: 68.
  6. Merchant TE, McCormick B. Prone position breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994; 30: 197-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Formenti SC, DeWyngaert JK, Jozsef G, et al. Prone vs Supine Positioning for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy, JAMA. 2012; 308(9): 861-863. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Lymberis SC, DeWyngaert JK, Parhar P. Prospective Assessment of Optimal Individual Position (Prone Versus Supine) for Breast Radiotherapy: Volumetric and Dosimetric Correlations in 100 Patients. Int J of Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012; 84(4): 902-909. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Stegman LD, Beal KP, Hunt MA, MS, et al. Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Whole-Breast Irradiation Delivered in the Prone Position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68(1): 73-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Formenti, S, et al.Phase I-II Trial of Prone Accelerated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy to the Breast to Optimally Spare Normal Tissue,, JCO 2007; 25(16): 2236-2242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Formenti S. (2010). Five-year results of prone accelerated partial breast irradiation: NYU 00-23. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 78 (Suppl.), Abstract No. 2004. Go to original source...
  12. Formenti SC, Lymberis S, Parhar P, Fenton-Kerimian C, Magnolfi B, Wen B, Chang J, Dewyngaert J. Results of NYU 05-181: a prospective trial to determine optimal position (prone versus supine) for breast radiotherapy. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 51st Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA.
  13. Patt DA, Goodwin JS, Kuo YF, et al. Cardiac morbidity of adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 7475-7482. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Marks LB, Yu X, Prosnitz RG, et al. The incidence and functional consequences of RT-associated cardiac perfusion efects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63(1): 214-223. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Darby SC, Cutter DJ, Boerma M, Constine LS, Fajardo LF, Kodama K, Mabuchi K, Marks LB, Mettler FA, Pierce LJ, Trott KR, Yeh ET, Shore RE. Radiation-related heart disease: current knowledge and future prospects. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 76, 656-665.
  16. Chino JP, Marks LB. Prone positioning causes the heart to be displaced anteriorly within the thorax: implications for breast cancer treatment. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008; 70: 916-920. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Formenti S, et al. Results of NYU 05-181: A Prospective Trial to Determine Optimal Position (Prone versus Supine) for Breast Radiotherapy, IJROBP 2009; 75(3): S203-S204. Go to original source...
  18. Kirby, Anna M., Philip M. Evans, Sarah J. Helyer, Ellen M. Donovan, et al.: A randomised trial of Supine versus Prone breast radiotherapy (SuPr study): Comparing set-up errors and respiratory motion, Radiotherapy and Oncol, 2011; 100(2): 221-226. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Barett A, Dobbs J, Morris S, et al. Practical Radiotherapy Planning, 4th edition, London: Hachette UK Company 2009: 269-271. Go to original source...
  20. French Society of Radiation Oncology, World J of Radiol, 2010 March 28; 2(3): 103-108.




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.