Onkologie. 2022:16(1):20-24 | DOI: 10.36290/xon.2022.004

New treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Alexandr Poprach, Radek Lakomý
Klinika komplexní onkologické péče, Masarykův onkologický ústav a LF MU, Brno

The dynamic development in the treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is remarkable. Until a few years ago, we thought that the era of targeted treatment was ending and that this therapy would be replaced by immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Subsequently, however, it turned out that the administration of checkpoint inhibitors alone, or a their combination, would probably not be sufficient, and in some patients a combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy would be more appropriate. It is currently considered to be the most topical submission of these combinations concomitantly. Although it is necessary to wait for data from both clinical studies and real practice, whether sequential administration is not therapeutically comparable at the cost of less toxicity. In this review, we will look at the latest results of studies that examine the effectiveness of modern treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, especially in the first-line treatment.

Keywords: renal cell carcinoma, targeted treatment, immunotherapy, overall survival.

Published: February 22, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Poprach A, Lakomý R. New treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Onkologie. 2022;16(1):20-24. doi: 10.36290/xon.2022.004.
Download citation

References

  1. Poprach A, Lakomý R. Renální karcinom a imunoterapie. Onkologie. 2016;10(6):251-255. Go to original source...
  2. Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M,et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5):706-720. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz056. PMID: 30788497. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Powles T. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Recent eUpdate to the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma on cabozantinib and nivolumab for first-line clear cell renal cancer: Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(3):422-423. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Albiges L, Tannir NM, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. ESMO Open. 2020;5(6):e001079. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Emamekhoo E, Olsen MR, Carthon BC, et al. Safety and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and brain metastases: results from the CheckMate 920 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39, no. 15_suppl 2021;20:4515-4515. Go to original source...
  6. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus axitinib (axi) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): results from 42-month follow-up of KEYNOTE-426. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:suppl.15:abstr.4500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Zarrabi K, Handorf HA, Miron B. Real-world outcomes in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma receiving front-line axitinib plus pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab plus nivolumab. J Clin Oncol. 39, 2021;suppl.15:abstr.4551. Go to original source...
  8. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, et al. CheckMate 9ER Investigators. Nivolumab plus Cabozantinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(9):829-841. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Grünwald V, Powles T, Kopyltsov E, et al. Analysis of the CLEAR study in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Depth of response and efficacy for selected subgroups in the lenvatinib (LEN) + pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and sunitinib (SUN) treatment arms. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39, no. 15_suppl 2021;20:4560-4560. Go to original source...
  10. Haanen J, Larkin J, Choueiri TK, et al. Efficacy of avelumab + axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by IMDC risk group in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39, no. 15_suppl, 2021; 20:4574-4574. Go to original source...
  11. Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha SY, et al. CLEAR Trial Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(14):1289-1300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. McKay RR, McGregor BA, Xie W, et al. Optimized management of nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma: A response-based phase II study (OMNIVORE). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4240-4248. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Grimm MO, Schmidinger M, Duran Martinez I, et al: Tailored immunotherapy approach with nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma (TITAN-RCC). Ann Oncol. 2019;(30)suppl 5: V892. Go to original source...
  14. Graham J, Wells C, Dudani S, et al. Effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021;(39)no. 6_suppl:316-316. Go to original source...
  15. Lee C, Voss MH, Carlo MI, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Results of a phase 2 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021;(39)no. 15_suppl:4509-4509. Go to original source...
  16. Procopio G, Pircher C, Claps M, et al. A phase II open-label study of cabozantinib after first-line treatment including an immune-checkpoint combination in patients with advanced or unresectable renal cell carcinoma: The BREAKPOINT trial (MeetUro trial 03 - EudraCT number 2018-000582-36) Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021; (39)no. 6_suppl:326-326. Go to original source...
  17. Pal SK, Tangen C, Thompson IM Jr, et al. A comparison of sunitinib with cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10275):695-703. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Fallah J, Gittleman H,Weinstock C, et al. Survival benefit of nephrectomy prior to immunotherapy-based combinations in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: An FDA pooled analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2021;(39):no. 15_suppl 4516-4516. Go to original source...
  19. Ghali F, Patel SH, Derweesh IH. Current Status of Immunotherapy for Localized and Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Oncol. 2019;1:7309205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H,et al. Molecular Subsets in Renal Cancer Determine Outcome to Checkpoint and Angiogenesis Blockade. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(6):803-817.e4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Zhoubný novotvar ledviny (C64). Linkos.cz. Linkos: Česká onkologická společnost České lékařské společnosti J. E. Purkyně Linkos.cz [online] [cit. 21.07.2021]. Dostupné z: https://www.linkos.cz/lekar-a-multidisciplinarni-tym/personalizovana-onkologie/modra-kniha-cos/aktualni-vydani-modre-knihy/27-21-zhoubny-novotvar-ledviny-c64/.




Oncology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.